|
||||||||||
2005-12-12 |
Withdrawal of CBTL UL International Italia Milano |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-11-22 |
BSN, Indonesia joins the IECEE and becomes Member Body |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-08-15 |
KEBS, Kenya joins the IECEE and becomes Member Body |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-08-10 |
Logo Change: KEMA replaces the old logo |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-05-04 |
Logo Change: SGS Belgium NV - Division SGS CEBEC replaces the old logo |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-04-11 |
Name Change: TUV Product Services Asia Ltd. becomes TÜV Hong Kong Ltd. - TÜV SÜD Group |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-04-06 |
Efficient access to global markets at minimal cost: the IECEE CB Scheme |
|||||||||
Q: How has the world of conformity assessment changed over the past 20 years? A: There have been three big changes that are the result of globalization, all of them having to do with the need for faster market access, greater rigour and efficiency, and consistency among the NCBs and CBTLs.* The markets have changed from being national or regional to being global. Conformity assessment is a tool that provides access to markets, so change comes as a result of pressure by industry to access markets more easily. About 20 years ago manufacturers had to have a conformity assessment mark for each country that they wanted to access, and in many cases conformity assessment fell under the regulatory area. But markets began to globalize and the old system came to be seen as inefficient. Europe with its regional schemes began using multilateral agreements and the CB Scheme came into being in 1985. By 1995, globalization was in full swing and the CB Scheme, which had not been as active as it could have been, started to become much more important. Since globalization began, there’s been a move towards simplifying things by means of a single test and a single certificate for entry into multiple markets. Along with globalization came liberalization. Markets moved from mandatory to voluntary testing. This means it’s the participants in the market who decide whether or not to require certification. Since they’re free to do so, they recognize the value in choosing third-party certification. Globalization and liberalization are still evolving and there are still different certification marks that are needed to access some markets, but CB Test Certificates play a great role in accessing these markets with their high acceptance and recognition by the relevant NCBs. As for greater rigour, the IECEE focused on ensuring that peer assessment was really an in-depth and professional assessment and not just something cursory. The strength of the system relies on the competence of its members, so we have a fundamental interest in ensuring that each member measures up. We revisited our assessment procedure and made it much more intensive, focused on the real technical aspects with thorough documentation of the process. Thirdly, manufacturers’ testing laboratories have been fully taken into account in the operation of the IECEE systems to ensure consistency in applying IEC standards for product compliance, which means that the safety issue for their products has been addressed thoroughly. As markets globalized, manufacturers needed to access global markets more efficiently and faster, so we developed new processes for them to do this: supervised manufacturer testing, testing at manufacturer’s premises, witnessed manufacturer testing, and recognized manufacturer testing, the latter being the most demanding for manufacturers in terms of capability. Q: Where is conformity assessment heading in the next several years? A: Predicting the future is very difficult, but I think it’s clear to all that we will continue with two basic trends. The market is very competitive and the CB Scheme helps manufacturers to, one, reduce costs and, two, shorten the time it takes to get to market. I don’t see these trends stopping any time in the near future, so the CB Scheme will develop new procedures to remain responsive to industry’s evolving needs and at the same time we’ll develop new business opportunities with the CB Full Certification Scheme (CB-FCS) and the factory inspections/audits which are an important part of it. Q: In 2001 the CB Scheme issued 19 600 test certificates. In 2004 that figure rose to 38 000. Why is growth this strong? A: More and more buyers and dealers are asking for proof of CB Scheme testing and certification from their suppliers, just as some industrializing countries are insisting that imported goods be certified by CB Scheme testing labs. So manufacturers find themselves required to show proof of compliance against IEC standards. It ensures that electrical products are safe and performing and that’s good for both manufacturers and their clients. The CB Scheme is the global reference for certification and good marketing by CB Scheme members has a great deal to do with its success. When clients ask about the best way to enter new markets, our members tell them about the CB Scheme. I suspect that some of our expansion also has to do with our members’ clients talking to each other, promoting us by word-of-mouth. So a little like Coca-Cola, the CB Scheme has become a trademark in its own right. Q: From the international trade perspective, what is the added value for a manufacturer to seek certification under the IECEE scheme? A: The CB Scheme provides an international passport that gives faster access to markets and the assurance that the products comply with the IEC standards. Multiple testing and multiple certification slows down access to multiple markets. Having a single test and one or more certification marks giving access to multiple markets is far more efficient. In-depth peer assessment helps to ensure confidence-building among the members and confidence in accepting test results. Q: Taking that point further, many developing nations have aired concerns that they are the potential dumping grounds for unsafe electrical equipment. Can the IECEE meet these concerns? A: Let’s make it clear that the IECEE does not manufacture equipment, it coordinates and administers a worldwide system for testing electrical equipment. For a country that has no electrotechnical industry and no recognized testing laboratory, the CB Scheme can still offer added value. These countries may wish to set rules for imported electrical products whereby only products that can show that they have been approved through the IECEE CB or FCS Schemes could be authorized to access their markets. South Africa is an example of a country that requires that imported electrical goods come with CB test certificates. The CB Scheme can easily work with countries that have mandatory certification and help to provide market access there. Once industrialization starts and there is a nascent electrotechnical industry, then the CB Scheme has a great deal to offer as our test certificates will help to ensure the proof of compliance to IEC standards of both local goods for export as well as imported goods. An industrializing country with low labour costs and high-quality goods for export is in a very competitive position.
A: The IEC already has all of the world’s industrialized countries participating, so new members from now on will mostly be industrializing countries – those whose electrotechnical industry is beginning to develop. To be a member of the IECEE, you need to be a member of the IEC.** But what’s really worth noting is the very reasonable entrance fees and subsequent annual fees to maintain membership. Once a country is a member, it has access to almost all services and documents, can participate in all meetings and can develop its expertise in testing and certification with their counterparts. There are very clear benefits to this and Malaysia is a good example as it started as a Member Body and then later added an NCB and an associated CBTL. By participating as a Member Body of the IECEE and learning about it, by meeting all kinds of people from testing labs and from industry, the Malaysian delegates developed a very good understanding of how it all works. They took this back to Malaysia with them and influenced government and industry there, so that now Malaysia is active in issuing and recognizing CB test certificates and has aligned its standards with those of the IEC. This signifies a real transfer of technology and knowledge. Q: The recent agreement between IEC and ILAC benefits who and why? (please click here for full article regarding this agreement) A: It benefits our members, the testing laboratories, as they are simultaneously members of the IECEE and customers of ILAC. The agreement has to do with harmonizing procedures and forms, carrying out joint assessments and common understanding of ISO/IEC 17025, which is the document that lays down the requirements of how an assessment is carried out. Instead of having to be assessed separately by both the CB Scheme and by ILAC, the assessment can be done just once. It’s cost effective and more efficient this way. Q: How does the new ISO/IEC 17050 standard fit into the IECEE scheme? A: The three IEC conformity assessment systems, and this includes the IECEE, are third-party systems, while supplier’s declaration of conformity is first-party conformity assessment. IECEE recognizes that for some industries, SDoC could be used and/or requested in some markets or regions in the global market, and in this respect SDoC could use a CB test report as a basis for the SDoC so in that sense it is complementary. However, the significant and substantial growth of the CB Scheme proves that independent, third-party certification is requested by the market as a reliable and independent proof of conformity to IEC standards. * NCB: national certification body. CBTL: certification body test laboratory. **Note: it’s possible to be a member of the IECEE and not of the IEC for an initial period of three years, although costs for doing this are higher than for IEC members. |
||||||||||
2005-04-01 |
WITHDRAWAL of Japanese CBTL UL Apex Co., Ltd. Yokohama Branch |
|||||||||
Upon request of the NCB UL Apex, the following CBTL has been withdrawn from the CB Scheme: UL Apex Co., Ltd. |
||||||||||
2005-03-18 |
Entela Canada acquired by Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. Canada |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-03-01 |
IEC and ILAC agreement to improve efficiency and reduce assessment costs for testing laboratories |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 2005-02-28 | ||||||||||
|
Dear IECEE Members,
|
|||||||||
2005-02-01 |
New Product Category EMC Operational in the CB Scheme |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-01-17 |
Name Change: CEBEC becomes SGS Belgium NV - Division SGS CEBEC |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2005-01-12 |
Entela taken over by Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2004-12-15 |
IEC conformity assessment at workshop in India |
|||||||||
He discussed the three IEC conformity assessment systems: IECEE, IECEx and IECQ-CECC with the focus of his talk going to the IECEE CB Scheme. He went into detail about the peer assessment programme that is used to evaluate the certification bodies and test laboratories that are members of the CB Scheme. He explained how using the CB Scheme would help South Asian governments and importers to ensure that safer products were entering the domestic market, which ultimately benefits consumers, and how it also helped suppliers to bring products to market more quickly. The workshop took place on 6 and 7 December 2004, in New Delhi and brought together about 200 people from South Asian industry to learn about certifying to international standards. The workshop highlighted existing international standards and guides that cover product and management systems certification practice. Every year ISO organizes a similar regional workshop in a different country. |
||||||||||
2004-12-02 |
IECEE hosts second international Lead Assessors Training Course |
|||||||||
The most recent training course for international lead assessors took place from 18 - 19 November 2004 at the CCV Conference Center in Geneva, Switzerland. Hosted by the IECEE secretariat, the course brought together 30 participants from all regions of the world. Presentations by several speakers notably focused on critical elements pertaining to IEC/ISO Guide 65 and IEC/ISO Guide 17025, the functioning of IECEE operational documents and the role of the IECEE peer assessment in IEC conformity assessment programmes. The aim of this training course was to inform IECEE assessors of the most recent assessment techniques, build confidence among IECEE members/National Certification Bodies (NCBs) through professional and impartial assessment, and build confidence between the IECEE and the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). Three ILAC delegates from Austria , France and the United Kingdom attended the course. Peer assessment is used by the IECEE to ensure that all testing laboratories within the CB Scheme provide an equally high competence and quality of service necessary to build confidence among member NCBs who are the operators of the CB Scheme. Upon successfully passing the final examination at the end of the course, participants received a certificate and were formally registered as IECEE lead assessors.
IECEE lead assessors are seen as key players in the IECEE community and in the peer assessment programme, an essential element of the IECEE CB Scheme. Future lead assessment training courses are scheduled to take place in Chicago, USA, in 2005, in Beijing, China in 2005 and in Geneva , Switzerland in 2007. For more information regarding these courses, please contact IECEE Executive Secretary, Pierre de Ruvo. To view more pictures from this event, please click here. |
||||||||||
2004-12-02 |
Korean manufacturers take close look at photovoltaics |
|||||||||
About 40 Korean electrical manufacturers spent an afternoon learning about Korean and IEC certification work in the field of photovoltaics (PV) during a seminar held on 20 October in Seoul, Republic of Korea. With the Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS) as host, the event was chaired by the president of the Korean Photovoltaics Development Organization, Donghwan Kim, who is Associate Dean of Engineering at Korea University. The Director of the KATS Energy and Resources Standards Division, Il-sub Shin, provided the welcome speech to the group.
Attendees to the seminar enjoyed a presentation by KATS Senior Researcher, Sung-ho Shin, who spoke about PV certification systems and standards in Korea . IECEE Executive Secretary, Pierre de Ruvo, gave an overview of the IECEE photovoltaics certification process, while Secretary of PV Global Approval Program’s Executive Board, Richard Kay, spoke about introducing PV GAP to Korea. Conformity assessment for photovoltaics passed from the IECQ-CECC to the IECEE CB Scheme in 2004. Previously, certification bodies within the IECQ-CECC tested the PV components and units as stand-alone items. But the market wanted PV components and units tested for safety and performance within a system and the IECEE, which deals with components, equipment and systems, was seen as the right place for this work. In May 2004 BP Solar was the first company to receive a conformity assessment certificate from the IECEE Full Certification Scheme (CB-FCS) for its solar electric modules manufactured in India , China, Spain and Australia. |
||||||||||
2004-12-02 |
Korea Testing Laboratory |
|||||||||
Korea Testing Laboratory (KTL), founded in 1966, was the first national calibration and measurement agency in the Republic of Korea. Today it employs 450 people and consists of six centres, the biggest of which handles electrotechnology. In 2003 KTL had a turnover of USD 50 million. Its market is fairly evenly split at 50 % domestic and 50 % international, the latter being mostly Japan, China , Southeast Asia and Western Europe. KTL’s competitors are well-known certification bodies that do business in Korea under the IECEE CB Scheme.
KTL’s participation has grown rapidly since it first investigated the CB Scheme in the early 1990s. “Back then,” says KTL Electrotechnical Centre Director General Insop Song, “we were looking at ways to enter the European and American markets. European test labs and certification bodies knew who we were, but didn’t accept our test reports or certificates. We saw that the EU depended on the IEC and that it was also important not only for North American but also for Asian markets. That led us logically to the CB Scheme and the government, via Korea National Institute of Technology and Quality (formerly Korea Agency for Technology and Standard), gave its support for KTL to become a member of the CB Scheme. We started by testing and certifying for the IT and office equipment category and found it to be very successful for us.” Today, KTL tests and certifies for 11 of the 16 product categories in the CB Scheme and plans to test and certify for all of them by 2006. In the early 1990s, income for the Electrotechnical Centre resulting from international business was virtually zero and growing at only about 5 % per year. But in the late 1990s Korea suffered a severe financial crisis and the currency was devalued drastically. To survive, Korean manufacturers needed to export and they turned to KTL for this. The CB Scheme allows for rapid entry into new markets because CB Scheme certificates are recognized by all participating NCBs. Because KTL was able to issue these certificates, Korean manufacturers could find new markets quickly. 20 % annual growth Song says that half of the Electrotechnical Centre’s income is from Korean companies and half is from international companies and that the latter is growing at more than 20 % per year because Korean companies are moving operations into Southeast Asia in the search for lower manufacturing costs and then selling their products back into the domestic market from abroad. Song also says that the market as a whole is growing, and that Asian countries now appear to be adopting IEC standards just as the European Union has been doing. In response to this growing market, KTL developed an annual, month-long, In-Service Tutorial Programme for Asian certification and/or testing bodies, including China, to come to Seoul to learn about IEC standards and the CB Scheme. In October of 2004, 16 engineers from Asia participated in the programme. He says that SIRIM Berhad – Malaysia’s national certification body – came to study how KTL operates the system, possibly with the intention of developing a similar system. “This is good for KTL,” he says, “because strong competitors make us stronger. It is good for us to have strong competitors because it forces us to provide our customers with even better services. So, at the heart of it all, the CB Scheme actually helps our customers, not our competitors.”
KTL has also been involved with IECQ (now ) since 1979 and, at present has three major Korean electronic component manufacturers certified under the system. Another six are waiting for the IECQ merger with CECC (which was completed in 2003) to develop further before coming on board. Service to the national economy
For the past three years, Song has observed that developing countries and their certification bodies that are trying to apply IEC standards and its conformity assessment schemes are having difficulty getting the information they need. “To help them to obtain the information they need,” says Song, “I suggest creating a separate page in the IEC website for them, one that contains the relevant information on IEC, its committees, boards, and schemes. I believe that this would be a good guide to help them to establish their system and get clearer information.” He points out that the IECEE website is a good example of one that shares well organized information Case study In 1996 the Director General of the Korea Testing Laboratory’s Electrotechnical Centre, Insop Song, participated in an APEC meeting representing the Republic of Korea. South American and Southeast Asian countries saw the value in IEC standards and had been harmonizing their national standards with IEC International Standards. Samsung Electronics wanted to begin exporting to South America, particularly Argentina, and needed a test report to do so. Samsung asked KTL to help by signing a Memorandum of Understanding with South American certification bodies. Song went to IRAM, the Argentine standards institute, to sign the MOU. This opened up the Argentine market to Samsung, whose exports to that country now amount to USD 50 million per year. Insop Song
Established in November 2000, the ANF is a non-governmental regional body with five founding members: KTL, Japan Quality Assurance Organization, China Quality Certification Centre, PSB Corporation ( Singapore) and Electronics Testing Centre (Taiwan). Its goal is to have one standard, one test and one certification for its members. It consists of four committees: policy, promotion, international relations and technical. "In Asia,” says Song, “we need a common system and the ANF can help to create it. We know electronic products because around half of the world’s production is manufactured in Asia. But Asian participation in things like the CB Scheme is limited. We have very little input to creating the standards that the CB Scheme uses. This is due to both financial and political reasons. While Europe tends to dominate, we’d like to see more Asian input, so we formed ANF to help us with this.” |
||||||||||
2004-12-02 |
OVE: On duty in electrotechnology for 121 years |
|||||||||
By Christian Gabriel, Secretary of the Austrian National Committee of the IEC The Austrian Electrotechnical Association (Österreichischer Verband für Elektrotechnik – OVE), a private non-profit organization, emerged from the Vienna Electrotechnical Society which was founded in 1883. Since then the association has been a central national platform for all electrotechnical experts and companies dealing with the development and the progress of techniques, science and the technical problems that arise whenever electrical energy is applied. Times have changed significantly but OVE’s mission is still as topical as ever:
With the IEC from the beginning
Electrotechnical standardization in Austria
Though the number of OEK staff members is quite small, the team is very efficient and acts quickly in a flexible way in response to all the different daily challenges. The outstanding competence acquired over the years has been acknowledged at the national and international levels as well.
Financing OEK’s work is based on the sales of standards, which contribute around 80 % of the turnover. IEC and CENELEC membership fees are refunded by the Austrian authorities.
The Austrian way forward Being aware that most of the basic decisions in standardization are settled at the international level, and therefore knowing about the strategic relevance of being integrated in the international standardization work, OEK strongly promotes and supports the active participation of national experts in international standardization. This is done by frequent workshops and in-house promotion tours (especially focused on small- to medium-sized enterprises). Through the workshops and in-house seminars the benefits of standardization, the possibilities of participating in standardization, and the right use of the different procedures and tools are communicated. It seems to be a big task to convince the stakeholders about the necessity of standards to support the national economy and promote electrotechnical safety and therefore to encourage their continuing investment in standardization. However we’ll stay on the road and keep the ball rolling. Contact details: AUSTRIAN IEC NATIONAL COMMITTEE Telephone: +43 (1) 587 63 73 |
||||||||||
2004-11-29 |
||||||||||
Should you have any suggestion and comments to improve their information please contact CQC by using the following communication data: International Certification Dept. |
||||||||||
2004-11-03 |
||||||||||
We're all aware that electrical mains plugs and socket-
|
||||||||||
2004-11-01 |
New USNC/IECEE contact person |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
2004-10-25 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2004-10-08 |
Re-assessment and Scope Extension at CQC, BTIHEA, TIRT and SEC in Beijing |
|||||||||
Group 1, composed of Dr. Wolfgang Kreinberg (TÜV PS GmbH as Convenor), Arun Sachdeva (STQ), Yasuaki Hazeyama (TÜV Rheinland Japan) and José Madeira Cruz (ISQ Portugal), performed the assessment at CQC as NCB and the CBTLs BTIHEA, TIRT and SEC, all located in Beijing. The assessment team discovered a certification body and laboratories that spent significant time in preparing themselves for this important assessment. The atmosphere during the assessment was very cordial, with the staff being very responsive both in the laboratory and in the quality departments. As such the assessment, despite the very broad scope, was performed and reported on in the given time frame. The pictures show the opening meeting with Prof Li Hualin (CQC) and his staff and some impressions during the assessment. |
||||||||||
2004-10-06 |
||||||||||
1. IEC 61730-1 and 61730-2 (PV module safety qualification) have been approved and will be published by 2004-10-15. 2. IEC 62124 (Design verification of PV stand alone systems) has been approved and will be published by 2004-10-10. 3. Project 61727 (Utility interface for PV systems ) has been circulated as an FDIS and the IS is expected to be published by 2004-12-31. 4. Project 61215, 2nd edition: Central Office is preparing an FDIS, expected date of FDIS circulation 2004-11, expected date of publication 2005-02. 5. Project 62093 (Balance-of-system components for PV systems – Design qualification natural environments): Central Office just started FDIS preparation, expected date of FDIS circulation 2005-02, expected date of publication 2005-05. 6. The next meeting of IEC TC 82 is planned to be held in Beijing in |
||||||||||
2004-10-06 |
||||||||||
Following the IECEE Management Committee resolution to approve the Recognized Manufacturer Testing procedure, I would like to provide you with some more elements pertaining to the nature of the RMT procedure so that your client can benefit from this alternate route to obtain CB Test Certificates. The RMT concept combines rigorous qualification of the manufacturer's capabilities, a confidence building phase, extensive exchange of information between the NCB and the RMTL, verification of reports and a specified laboratory surveillance programme. RMT is a procedure by which an NCB assesses initially, and on an on-going basis, the capability and expertise of the manufacturer’s laboratory(ies) according to ISO/IEC 17025 and any other relevant IECEE Operational Documents, including the laboratory’s quality management system and the laboratory’s testing processes. The primary benefit of the RMT procedure to a manufacturer is the improved speed to market, since the manufacturer is in control of the timetable for product evaluation and testing. The NCB retains the full role of a Certification Body in accordance with ISO/IEC Guide 65 and the IECEE Rules of Procedure. The RMTL uses its own personnel and test equipment, takes responsibility for, and signs the test report. However, the task of reviewing the Test Report and taking the certification decision remains under the full responsibility of the NCB prior to issuing a CB Test Certificate. In addition to the rigorous process, any candidate RMTL must have operated as an SMT Laboratory with its NCB(s) during two years immediately prior to the application. Finally, a key point to note is that an RMT Laboratory will be subject to a special IECEE re-assessment process coordinated by the IECEE Secretariat in order to grant integrity, impartiality and build confidence among the IECEE members. As you can see from the above, the RMT programme is the highest level of competence and professionalism that a manufacturer can achieve to be entitled to operate under the IECEE CB Scheme. Pierre de Ruvo |
||||||||||
2004-10-01 |
Change of name of NCB/CBTL FM Approvals |
|||||||||
The name of NCB/CBTL FM Approvals has recently been changed to FM Global Technologies LLC (also known as FM Approvals). |
||||||||||
2004-09-27 |
TRANSFER OF OPERATIONS OF CBTL UL International Services Ltd. Taiwan Branch |
|||||||||
UL International Services Ltd. Taiwan Branch now is operating under the responsibility of UL International Demko A/S for the Product Category OFF. |
||||||||||
2004-09-01 |
BP Solar is first solar module manufacturer to receive international product conformity certificate – Allows for commercial acceptance in global markets |
|||||||||
The IECEE CB Scheme is the world’s first truly international system for acceptance of test reports dealing with the safety of electrical and electronic products. It is a multilateral agreement among participating countries and certification organizations. A manufacturer using a CB test report issued by one of these organizations can obtain national certification in all other member countries of the CB Scheme. According to BP Solar Product Line Director Dr. Jean Posbic, "BP Solar chose to seek this certification because it allows us to simplify the external certification process of our solar modules as this certificate combines performance, quality and safety certifications." IECEE Executive Secretary Pierre de Ruvo says, "It is significant that a major player has chosen to certify its modules within the IECEE PV Programme and seek the international CB-FCS certificate. We take a business approach to providing market players with what they need to help them compete and we are proud that BP Solar has given us the opportunity to deliver the first CB-FCS certificate to them." Eight certification bodies and associated testing laboratories in seven member countries participate in the IECEE PV CB-FCS programme, which is based on mutual recognition of the conformity assessment certificates issued by its members. These serve as the basis for certifying electrical products at the national and international level and is recognized by PV GAP to grant its International Seal. It is an extension of the CB Scheme, which is operated by the International Electrotechnical Commission’s Worldwide System for Conformity Testing and Certification of Electrical Equipment ( IECEE). PV GAP is a not-for-profit organization, registered in Switzerland, that certifies the quality of photovoltaic systems and components. PV GAP also promotes the development and use of internationally accepted standards that promote integrating quality into all aspects of PV energy delivery. The organization encourages international reciprocity of national specifications for manufacturers, testing laboratories and accreditation of training programs in installation, operation and maintenance for PV practitioners. (September 2004) |
||||||||||
2004-08-04 |
WITHDRAWAL OF UK CBTL ERA Technology Ltd. |
|||||||||
Upon request of the NCB ASTABEAB, the following CBTL has been withdrawn from the CB Scheme: ERA Technology Ltd. |
||||||||||
2004-08-04 |
NEWS FROM THE CMC 2004 MEETING HELD IN KYOTO, JAPAN ON 2004-06-24/25 |
|||||||||
| The 7th IECEE Certification Management Committee (CMC) General Meeting, held in Kyoto, Japan, from 24 to 25 June 2004, led to a number of actions and decisions of particular importance to manufacturers, national certification bodies (NCBs) and IECEE members. Meeting photos can be viewed by clicking here. Photos taken at the Offiical Dinner can be viewed by following this link.
The second term of office will commence on the 1st of January 2005 and will end on the 31st of December 2009. Among the many decisions taken during the meeting, five main ones stand out. Level of reciprocity over the NCBs New product category: electromagnetic compatibility Recognized manufacturers’ testing Official signature of the Master Multilateral Agreement (MLA)
Component recognition program |
||||||||||
2004-06-16 |
News from the 41st Committee of Testing Laboratories (CTL) Meeting held in Singapore |
|||||||||
With PSB Corporation playing host, the 41st Committee of Testing Laboratories (CTL) Meeting successfully took place in Singapore on 24 to 27 May. Over 70 expert representatives, coming from 165 laboratories worldwide, attended this annual IECEE (International Electrotechnical Commission System for Conformity Testing and Certification of Electrical Equipment) event. The 41st CTL Meeting was a significant event for PSB Corporation as this was the first time in the CTL history that the annual meeting has been held in Singapore. The CTL Meeting served as an exchange platform whereby delegates of various international laboratories congregated to discuss and develop solutions to testing problems, as well as to decide how tests should best be executed in order to achieve reproducibility of results. About the CTL
|
||||||||||
2004-06-16 |
Testing & Certification Conference 2004: Global Compliance for IT, AV and Telecom Products |
|||||||||
| Enjoying its fourth successful run, PSB Corporation's Testing & Certification Conference extended its fine track record by providing timely compliance updates for the information technology, electrotechnology and telecommunication industries. The conference theme this year, “Global Compliance for IT, AV and Telecom Products” presented an opportunity for companies to reevaluate their product development stages and approval requirements in light of the current industry challenges and competitive realities. Besides experts from PSB Corp and its subsidiary, Sibercert, revered veterans - Mr Pierre de Ruvo, Executive Secretary of the IECEE and Mr Robert Wunderer, Convener of the CTL Expert Task Force 2 – were the featured speakers. The sessions were devoted to the following topics:
|
||||||||||
2004-06-07 |
Change of name of CBTL GTIES |
|||||||||