IEC Conformity Assessment Schemes: the situation on the ground
It is often alleged that the IEC’s three conformity assessment schemes – IEC System for Conformity Testing and Certification of Electrical Equipment (IECEE), the IEC Quality Assessment System for Electronic Components (IECQ) , and the Scheme for Certification to Standards for Explosive Atmospheres(IECEx) – are a closed shop, accessible only to full IEC Members. Earlier this year, the IEC’s Conformity Assessment Board(CAB) took a closer look at the realities behind this perception. The resulting document (summarized below) gives an interesting insight into the IEC’s three schemes. iec e-tech recently talked to CAB Chairman and IEC Vice-president, Clif Johnston, about the process and the document.
|
Why exactly did the CAB look into the Schemes’ openness?
JOHNSTON: Over the past few years we have been aware of a few misunderstandings about the whole question of the IEC schemes, both within the IEC community and for external audiences. Although there were pressures from outside that we should be opening up our schemes, when we analyzed the situation we found the schemes were already quite open, much more open than people had imagined. Certainly, the statement that any manufacturer in the world can have access to the schemes is just about as open as you can get. As a manufacturer or supplier, you are free to go to any certification body within the schemes to get your products certified. The rules of the schemes require all other members to recognize those certificates.
How can a country use the IEC’s Conformity Assessment Schemes? Can any country in the world use them?
I think we surprised ourselves when we examined how many countries already do recognize the schemes. The term "autonomous recognition" (see below) was developed outside of the IEC and we found that some non-member countries are very happy to accept the CB Test Certificate (from the IECEE Scheme) as evidence of conformity to standards that they recognize.
It is also interesting that, in terms of international standards, many non-member countries are inclined to accept IEC standards as they are without deviation. The IEC members are the likely ones to include the odd differences.
Why do certification bodies, testing laboratories and inspection agencies have to be in an IEC member country?
Once you start getting into the management and control of the operation you need to be in a country where there is a line of responsibility to the schemes of the IEC and for that reason it hasn’t been fully opened up. But that is something we are reassessing.
Could the same be said for national certifying/supervisory bodies?
I don’t want to say too much at this stage but we are looking at ways of accommodating them.
Are there any plans for expansion of the three schemes?
The CAB's policy is not to pursue expansion for the sake of expansion, but our objective is rather to remove barriers. We believe that any scheme should only be expanded into areas where there are existing national schemes that are causing barriers. If there is no national scheme, then there is no barrier.
Having said that there are plenty of areas the schemes are looking at – the IECEE is moving into the EMC field slowly and the IECQ is moving into photovoltaics and avionics. I tend to view the scheme on a functional basis. We have a set of rules which work well and depending on where these this new area needs to be developed we can slot it into one of those schemes. We are not totally bound to this thinking, however, and we are considering alternative structures in two areas – wind turbines and photovoltaics.
What does the IEC’s Masterplan 2000 mean in terms of Conformity Assessment?
The Masterplan makes it very clear that conformity assessment is a very important supporting function to standardization. The role within the IEC is growing very much – and I sense that the world is turning towards the way the IEC is doing things. We have long-established schemes that really work.
The Masterplan also raises the concept of putting an IEC mark on a product that conforms with one or other of our schemes. Industry looks at the success of the CB Scheme and would like to see the next step taken. They would like to see how the IEC schemes could be used as a means of reducing the proliferation of other marks. |